|
| |
The Human Centipede 2 (Full Sequence)
I’ve had this long running debate over whether Ed Wood was the all-time worst
director or an unappreciated comic genius. One rather well respected friend
stands with me that while there is overwhelming evidence to support the former
sufficient substantiation exists to justify the later. In a court of law this
would hold as reasonable doubt. The lesson learned here is that comedy is highly
subjective especially in one of the more difficult brands of comedy to master,
satire’. Occasionally this form of humor pushes up to the edge of good taste and
frequently sallies forth blissfully over it in order to make a not so subtle
point. A similar type of consideration is applicable to a more recent film that
has stirred up an excessive amount of controversy; ‘The Human Centipede 2 (Full
Sequence)’, the filmmaker Tom Six, stunned the cinematic community as well as
the general population in 2009 his independent horror flick, ‘The Human
Centipede (First Sequence) shocked everyone viewing it with one of the most
gratuitous, disgusting films every conceived. It was about a scientist obsessed
with the surgical attachment of three human beings by grafting them together
mouth to anus. The film was marketed as ‘100% medically accurate’ although I
have serious reservations the medical training and professional accreditation of
the ‘doctors’ that made that claim. I have little doubt some twisted pervert
with enough surgical proficiency to anastomosis the alimentary canals of three
people but even the short term survival is seriously dubious. It seemed that no
matter what the word ‘First’ in the title of the movie promised most people
agreed that the prospects of a sequel were seriously doubtful. Not only did Six
pulled off the sequel he has already announced that there will be a third flick
to complete the ‘Centipede trilogy’. The Blu-ray release of this latest movie
should come with antiemetic medication
and a commemorative emesis basin perhaps embossed with the centipede logo. There
should also be a prominent message admonishing perspective viewers and the
number for a psychological therapist subsidized by the distributor.
In a fashion typical of horror movie sequels this film opens by revisiting
the last few minutes of the original movie including the closing credits. The
camera pulls back to reveal we are watching the film playing on a laptop
computer. Martin Lomax (Laurence R. Harvey) is intently watching with maniacal
infatuation. It is very easy to see that Martin is a social outcast and as held
that regrettable station all his life. Martin is an overweight, kind of greasy
kind of guy with an obvious mental deficiency that appears beyond conventional
psychopharmacological intervention. Martin is the kind of guy that after the
inevitable heinous act is perpetrated his neighbors will tell the news cameras
that he was a creepy little man that they knew would do something sick and
twisted. As it turns out Charlie Manson would likely call him a creepy dude and
avoid him. He lives in a small flat in England along with his emotionally
abusive mother and excessively annoying neighbors with a perchance for extremely
loud club music. His job is literally a dead end one, a security guard in an
underground parking garage. There he spends his time further isolated from
people watching the well to do on close circuit television monitors. To add a
little icing on Martin’s psychopathy check list and another chapter in the
DSM-IV, Martin was sexually abused as a child by his father. In short, Martin is
a one man subject for a full doctorial dissertation on abnormal psychology. He
is obsessed with the film ‘The Human Centipede (First Sequence)’ watching it on
his laptop constantly both at home and on the job. After Martin murders his
mother in a fit of rage He decides to perform his own rendition of the Human
Centipede this time linking one dozen hapless victims. With absolutely no
medical training and armed only with an ad hoc assortment of garden tools and a
rented warehouse he sets about on his plan. In one of the most unbelievable
elements of the plot he phones three of the actors from the original movie by
impersonating Quentin Tarantino’s casting agent. Only one, Ashlynn Yennie
accepts. In difference to her unenviable position in the fictional centipede she
gets to be number one time hence avoiding feeding on feces. To make the story
even more disgusting, one victim is pregnant.
The main controversy of this film is the obvious use of perverted themes,
shocking images and entirely gratuitous shocking images. The reason I began this
consideration with comments about Ed Wood is there is a second line of heated
conversation over the filmmaker’s prime intention for this movie. Some are
satisfied with the obvious; Six wanted to disgust the audience an on that
account he succeeded wildly. Then there are those that offer some degree of
mitigation professing that Six intended to create a satire of the current state
of horror movies. I have to admit that after trying to get past the incredible
disgusting nature of the flick I do have to admit I can find some validation to
the case that Tom Six is a satirist. In the current well documented trend of
horror movies the onus has moved from and pretense of a story to the display of
methods to inflict pain and suffering that would make Tomás de Torquemada cringe
in abhorrence. Movie franchises like ‘Saw’ have engendered a generation of
filmmakers constantly attempting to outdo the horrible torture of their
competitors. Tom Six has grabbed this lamentable fad and upped the ante with a
reductio ad absurdum approach making something that has little intrinsic value.
He then continued the satiric motif by tackling the horror sequel. In the second
movie the body count always is greatly increased and the methods of carnage
becoming more elaborate and outlandish; he even found a way to ‘logically’ bring
back an original cast member. It has to be said that Six did accomplish this.
This movie is truly the quintessential horror sequel showing just how bad such
films typically are. His plan to go on to a trilogy does support this view.
Littler things like depicting the fan of the first film as a murderous
psychopath are a little dig on the types of people that get into so called
torture porn. Yes, it is definitely biting the hand that feeds him but it does
make a substantial point. Try watching on an empty stomach with this approach in
mind to see what I mean.
Posted 02/09/12
|