Some pieces of literature become enduring because they contain themes
that transcend a single time and place. In such cases it becomes the
responsibility of each generation to take such a story, add their own
personalizing spin making the tale their own. while this axiom originally
applied to the written form of literature the methodology behind this
concept existed in oral history and has extended to the current most popular
format for story telling; the motion picture. One excellent example of this
phenomenon is the story of ‘Robin Hood’. Many people may dismiss this story
as a pleasant action adventure or perhaps a love story but if you take the
time to consider it you will see that this story has every element necessary
for great literature. Of course there is the aforementioned action complete
with archers with deadly aim and swordsmen engaged in skillful fights to the
death. The romantic side of this story is legendary with Robin and Marion is
classic lovers fighting to be together. What is not so obvious are some of
the deeper themes of the story as it chronicles the historical conflict
between the Anglo-Saxons and the Britons hailing from Normandy. While much
of the historic eye was focused on the Crusades back home on that sceptred
isle a fight was underway that not only affected the privileged peerage but
involved the concept of rights ordained by law not the ephemeral royal
decree. The essence of the dramatic element of this story is political,
moralistic and philosophical elements that have been heatedly debated for a
very long time. There is a variation of the Robin Hood legend for every
conceivable demographic. I grew up enjoying the classic 1938 version
featuring Errol Flynn but there has been a reimagining every decade or so
including an animated version by Disney and a golden age television series.
The latest version considered here reunites the action hero presentation by
Russell Crowe under the direction of Ridley Scott.
Your appreciation of this incarnation of ‘Robin Hood’ will be affected
more than usual but the previous version you considered your favorite. This
film is much grittier and violent than any version I can recall. In fairness
this is just giving the audience what they demand. Considering it teams
Crowe and Scott there are several stylistic similarities with their previous
film together it is natural that the film has been called ‘Gladiator in
Tights’ although this in no way implies and frivolity in this version. The
picture painted of the titular hero is not the usual altruistic woodsman
stealing from the rich redistributing that wealth to the poor. Crowe gives
us a much different view of this legendary figure. This view depicts him as
a displaced mercenary who honed his considerable combat and tactical skills
in the infamous third Crusade. Now, back in England he is drawn into a class
struggle that is pervading most aspects of their society. Instigating much
of the grief is the newly crowned King John (Oscar Isaac). Unlike his late
older brother, Richard the Lionhearted, John is a self serving, greedy
narcissist intent on draining the population dry through the imposition of
cruel, punitive taxation. His main enforcer, Sir Godfrey (Mark Strong), is
unbeknownst to most actually an agent of the King of France who is using the
color of his authority to sow the seeds of unrest that potentially lead to
civil war making England ripe for takeover by the French.
Robin Longstride (Russell Crowe), Alan A'Dale (Alan Doyle), Will Scarlett
(Scott Grimes) and Little John (Kevin Durand) come back from fighting beside
King Richard only to be waylaid by Godfrey and his henchmen. Robin
impersonates nobleman Robert Loxley, a dead knight that Robin promised he
would return his sword to his aged father, Sir Walter (Max von Sydow). The
blind former knight implores Robin to continue the charade in order to help
his daughter-in-law, Lady Marian (Cate Blanchett). Their estate at the edge
of Sherwood Forest is being taxed into poverty and constantly raided by the
displaced commoners living in the forest. During the raids against the Crown
Robin uncovers the insidious plot being run by Godfrey. Soon the fight
escalates to the survival of the English nation.
Don’t let the PG-13 rating or the tradition of snappy dialogue and overly
staged battles deceive you; the level of violence here is much greater than
the typical Robin Hood flick. While the romantic overtures are still
retained the chemistry between Crowe and Blanchett is somewhat contrived
unlike the freewheeling banter that flew between Errol Flynn and Olivia de
Havilland. And while Strong rises to the task of screen villain he fails to
muster the panache and Basil Rathbone could provide with ease.
Stylistically, Scott is up to his high standards. The fast pace action
hardly ever pauses as the film drives towards the main epic battle. One
aspect that is highlighted in this version is the power that can be exerted
by a regular man even when it requires facing down the establishment.
Fortunately Scott is skillful in the way he eludes to the current political
debacle remaining focused on what his goal for the film was; an exciting,
action packed film and to that end he was successful. In some ways the film
could have benefited from more time in the editing bay cutting the length a
bit. Some of the extra scenes undoubtedly required for the exposition of the
socio-political climate vital to the character motivation in this telling.
This does complicate the story pulling it even further away from the classic
battle between good and evil. This is also the first version of the story
created specifically with high definition in mind. The lush greens of the
forest and deep blue of the water and sky is spectacular. One of the best
aspects of Blu-ray is how details become evident in a period piece such as
this it translates to a remarkable level of detail especially in such things
as the texture of the clothing or roughness of buildings. While not the best
Robin Hood around this one is worthy to be included in the company of the
others.