At one point in American history politics was something that only concerned
the citizens after the end of summer. As November and Election Day grew closer
men would sit around and argue about two main topics, politics and the
baseball’s World Series. Now, with many twenty four hour news channels, more
political commentators that most can keep track of and even politically oriented
comedy, politics is something almost constantly in the news. Because of this
cinema has moved on from the political drama like Mr. Smith Goes to Washington,
and on th documentaries that intrigue the public. Documentaries once where the
films that when their awards were being given on the Oscars, many went out to
the kitchen for a snack. In recent years the political documentary has moved
from the back of the art house to mainstream. One of this recent trend is ‘So
Goes the Nation’ by Adam Del Deo and James D. Stern. This film takes a look at
Ohio’s involvement in the highly debated 2004 Presidential Election.
One thing was sure about the 2004 Presidential race, it would be close. The
terms red and blue states where not only on the lips on many Americans but they
made for numerous color maps adorning the screens of every television news
program. The cloud that shrouded George W. Bush’s initial election, mostly
concerning hanging chads in Florida, were for the most part history. Del Deo and
Stern apparently set out to look at similar potential voting irregularities in
Ohio but what they cam up with was far less partisan and much more interesting.
This documentary is more ‘fair and balanced’ than most political films. It looks
at successes and mistakes made in both the Republican and Democratic camps.
Years ago during my undergraduate days I took a sociology class that examined
the electoral process like any advertising campaign. We used as our main
textbook Joe McGinniss’ book ‘The Selling of a President’. In Modern politics
the candidates are marketed and sold to the public like a box of breakfast
cereal. While this film does have a bit of bias towards the democrats it does
examine and represents both sides of this historical election.
Many point to potential indications that this election was ‘stolen’. Robert
F. Kennedy Jr. even made a statement to that effect. The film offers up facts
such as Ohio’s Republican Secretary of State Ken Blackwell. He not only served
in that election as the state’s Chief of Elections but was the co-chair of the
Committee to Re-elect George Bush. It should be noted that there is a lot of
overlap in any political position. This documentary shows that a simple case of
stealing the election was not at the heart of the results. The democrats failed
to mount a sufficient campaign to unseat an incumbent President. Democratic
candidate John Kerry depended on his war hero status to carry the day. This was
countered by the famous, or as some would say, infamous Swift Boat
advertisements that put Kerry’s war record under a shadow. The Democrats could
have flung some mud back with Bush’s State side service and the irregularities
that may surround it but they did not. There was also the pure dumb luck of
Osama Bin Laden’s November 1st video which only served to reinforce
one of the main planks of the Republican platform, the war on terror. The film
also goes into such items as vote identification requirements and a lack of
voting machines in predominately Democratic area but no hard evidence is offered
to either confirm or deny these allegations. Instead of pounding on the issues
the Democrats parade out celebrities of various degrees such as Daphne Zuniga
and Matt Dillion. Like a new breakfast item they depended on endorsements not
issues. In one scene actor Fisher Stevens is taken on very successfully by a
Bush supporter in the crowd. The endorsement of a fine actor does not make a
candidate a president. Running things for the Republicans was senior
presidential aide, Karl Rove. He is known for his ability to take the
opposition’s strengths and turn them into apparent weaknesses. He did this here
with Kerry’s status as a war hero. He also had the President pound away at the
need for the war in the middle east and how he has worked to keep the homeland
safe from terrorist. One issue that could have been used by the Democrats was
the debate over gay marriage. The Democrats were placed in a position that to
come out against this would leave them open to attacks on religious and moral
grounds. The Democrats where able to take the more liberal and progressive
coasts but failed to appeal to the heartland. Since pure numbers of votes don’t
matter as much as the, to many, mysterious Electoral College, key states like
Ohio could and did swing the election. Bush could just sit back, let Kerry speak
and then denounce him as a ‘flip flopper’ in public.
The election was not about the vital issues of the day as much as it was
about the men. Subjective attacks helped to win for the Republicans.The ultimate
conclusions presented in this film is the Democrats where ill prepared for the
race. They were unable to provide and aggressive enough platform and campaign to
win against the much more politically savvy Republicans. The directors do seem
to lament this but distributes the blame to both sides. Unlike documentary makes
like Michael Moore these two men where willing to change their focus and look at
the involvement on both sides. The made the effort to get statements from both
the Republicans and the Democrats. Although both men are from rich and
privileged families campaign ads show Bush chopping wood but Kerry wind surfing.
One man comes across as down home while the other has his ads backfire and seems
elitist. The directors show that mistakes where made by the Democratic team that
were countered and exploited by their rival Republicans.
Genius Productions in partnership with the Independent Film Channel have been
bringing the best in little known films to the public. Here they bring this
interesting and thought provoking work to DVD. The video is in 4:3 matted
widescreen with reasonable color balance and contrast. The Dolby stereo audio is
nothing special but it does get the job done. There are no extras but this film
stands on its own and it worth the purchase. If you are at all interested in the
political system this is a must have.
Posted 02/08/07