Creating a film in the genre of psychological thriller is more delicate than
most types of flicks. The writers have to achieve a balance on the fine line of
scaring the audience while letting the characters be human enough to connect
with the audience. No one was better than this than the late, great Alfred
Hitchcock and every director who has followed has used some of his techniques in
their own works. The most important thing in this sort of movie is to build the
anticipation in the audience. We have to be pulled into the story and care about
the characters and given ample evidence that some dire circumstances are about
to befall them. In the latest independent movie ‘Spiral’ Joel Moore manages to
provide a film that may not be as good as the master but it is amply satisfying.
Unlike many Indy films that are the brainchild of an individual this one is a
collaborative effort. Moore had a hand in both writing and directing but he had
help. In the script department he was joined by Jeremy Danial Boreing, this
being the first feature film scrip for both men. Sharing the director’s chair
with Moore is Adam Green who has several independent flicks under his belt
including the recent horror flick, ‘Hatchet’ where he performed every chore from
writer to director and producer. Keeping things in the family Moore also had the
leading male role in that flick. The reason why this group project works as well
as it does is this group are friends and have had years of practice being
creative together.
In this film Green and Moore prove they can do a lot more than straight
horror. They avoid the typical gratuitous use of blood and gore and take the
action into the minds of the audience. It is rare that a team can not only make
a transition like this but do it well. All too often writers and directors try
so hard to make a name in a particular genre that they become myopic in their
viewpoint. Film makers like this get as type cast as any actor in a very
specific type of movie. Green and Moore have widened their focus and endeavor to
make really good films. Much of the impact and strength of this film comes from
the trust Moore and Green have in their actors. Many of their contemporaries try
to over direct or over writer a movie. It is something special to see a team
writer for the talents of their cast instead of trying to force the story. Here
the script sets up the scaffold for the support of the actors. It defines the
world they live in but it is up to the cast not directorial camera tricks or
special effects to present the plot. This is a creative team that deserves
watching in the future.
The film starts with Mason (Joel Moore) walking in the rain towards a nice
little diner. He stains in the downpour looking at a pretty blonde waitress who
is chatting with some customers. Cut to Mason on the floor in some room, he
phones a man, Berkeley (Zachary Levi) who is in bed with a young woman and tells
him ‘I think I did something, something bad’. Berkeley blows Mason off; this
does not seem like an isolated incident. The next morning Mason goes to his job.
He works in a busy, cubical filled office as a telemarketer in an auto-insurance
office. Others around him are chatting with coworkers or busy at their jobs but
Mason enters as if he does not belong there; almost afraid to make any type of
contact. Berkeley not only happens to be Mason’s only friend his is also his
boss. He steps in front of Mason’s cubical and chews him out for being late even
though he only lives two and a half blocks away. Berkeley loosens his tie and
shifts into friend mode saying he must be tired because he was awakened in the
middle of the night. Mason appears to be functional even good at what he does.
While in the middle of a call he notices some dried blood on his wrist and runs
off to the bathroom.
During his lunch break in a little plaza outside the office Mason looks at
some sketches he made of a young woman, the one he was staring at in the coffee
shop. A young woman, Amber (Amber Tamblyn) sits down next to Mason and asks
Mason who the pretty girl in the picture is. Amber is friendly and tries her
best to make small talk with Mason but he is too withdrawn and concerned over
what may have happened last night. Finally he opens up to her just a little bit
saying he doesn’t draw he sketches, he’s a painter. That night Mason has a
nightmare about the waitress holding her arms out to him; he awakens startled
and shaken. The next day at lunch Mason sees Amber sitting alone and crying. He
goes over to her and Amber tells her that her supervisor has just told her she
is not cut out for sales; she has had the job less than a week. Slowly the two
become friends and Mason seems better able to talk to her. At night Mason is
disturbed by dreams of sketching the waitress Diana (Annie Neal) and during the
day he seems to look forward to seeing Amber. Eventually Amber agrees to pose
for Mason. It seems that there is one particular pose that he favors, the model
with her back to him looking over her shoulder. Things seem to progress in their
relationship but Mason is holding back, he is afraid of something lurking just
beyond his perception.
Apparently the division of director’s duties between Green and Moore was
along very natural lines. Since Moore is in almost every scene Green was the on
site director leaving Moore the behind the scenes jobs. This partnership works
incredibly well here. Some may complain that this film is paced far too slowly.
I have to vehemently disagree; it is perfect in the way it flows. A thriller is
like a fine meal that has all the ingredients added and then requires sufficient
time to simmer and blend. Some stories just can’t be rushed and this is one of
them. The audience gets time to know the characters. The potentially disturbing
nature of Mason is always there just beneath the surface. His dreams and visions
are evident that something very bad is wrong here but when he is with Amber
there is little of this darkness that shows. The directors give great latitude
to their cast and with ample reason, they are great. This is not to say that
Moore and Green just sat there and shouted ‘action’ and ‘cut’. They were there
to support their cast with visual and auditory themes that enhance the overall
mood. There is slow, smooth jazz throughout the film; the kind that can become
frantic without notice. The setting is in Portland that enables the directors to
juxtapose sunny days with rainy nights. This nicely sums up Mason’s mental
state; he can hold it together during the day but at night the inner turmoil
rains down on him.
Certainly many independent writer-directors like to cast themselves in their
own films. After all if you can’t pass an audition with yourself something is
very wrong. In the case of this film Moore just happens to be the best actor
around for the role of Mason. He has a look that is hang-dog enough that he
wouldn’t scare off a woman like Amber. He also looks like he is capable of any
number of heinous acts. Moore is the typical quite man next door and we all know
what that can mean. As far as supporting actors goes Zachary Levi is excellent
here. He may be familiar to regulars of the Sci-Fi channel for his titular role
in ‘Chuck’. He could have phoned in this part, the best friend of the disturbed
main character. Rather than doing that Levi adds dimension to his part. He
allows the superficial perspective of Berkeley to come down and show that he
really does care about his friend. Amber Tamblyn has a career that so far has
ranged from talking to God on television to running from horror flick psychos in
flicks. This film demonstrates that this young woman has more talent that she
has been allowed to show so far. The initial scenes opposite Moore were
beautiful awkward. She played Amber as a friendly girl trying to make a job she
is not suited for work out. She responds to the lost puppy in Mason and allows
herself to become emotionally attached. Tambyln makes this difficult part her
own and brings pathos and depth to it.
The film is available on DVD thanks to the folks over at Starz / Anchor Bay.
They have been responsible for some of the best in independent films for awhile
now. If your town lacks an art house be sure to keep your eye on their releases.
The video is an anamorphic 1.78:1 with brilliant color balance and exceptional
tonal qualities. The Dolby 5.1 has a sound field that is realistic and full.
There is a making of featurette that is pretty typical. The other extra is
great. It is a commentary track featuring Moore, Greene and Boreing as well as
Tamblyn and Levi. For added measure the director of photography, Will Barratt,
joins in the discussion. This is a film not to miss. It is a taut, well crafted
movie that will hold your attention for every minute.
Posted 02/03/08