Science fiction has always been one of my favorite genres. Like many, it was
my first favorite genre. As a boy I would watch any Sci-Fi film that appeared on
TV. There was a TV movie show called ‘Million Dollar Movie’ that attempted to
emulate the theater experience. It was on that show I first saw ‘The Day the
Earth Caught Fire’. Even at my tender young age I recognized something special
about this film. This film is part of a series of incredible British Sci-Fi of
the early sixties. Like many Sci-Fi films of that era the world’s fears of
nuclear war pervaded the themes presented in the flick. The difference between
British and American movies of the time is the British movies depended less on a
monster borne of radiation and more on the human reaction to a world in crisis.
‘The Day the Earth Caught Fire’ is one of the best representatives of films
depicting this time and place. Younger audiences may react a bit differently to
this film. Untouched by the Cold War paranoia many of us grew up with, the
quality of the film will impress audiences of all ages. The film presents the
story of a London investigative reporter, Peter Stenning (Edward Judd). Stenning
is bitter and disillusioned. A thorn in the side of his friend and editor, Bill
Maguire (Leo McKern), once Stenning gets his teeth into a story he will not let
go. London and the rest of the world is in the grips of an unexpected heat wave.
The temperature rises without letup as the population wonders as to the cause.
Stenning’s path crosses a switchboard operator in a Ministry department, Jeannie
Craig (Janet Munro) whose helps Stenning discover that the world governments are
withholding a terrible secrete from the public, simultaneous nuclear tests by
the Americans and the Soviets have pushed the Earth off of its normal axis and
tilted it over disrupting the normal weather. The world was on the brink of
burning up. As the news is revealed to the public they react with hedonistic
riots in the streets. The story contains the feel of the cold war, the worries
over the then unknown effects of radiation and the ever popular theme of
governments withholding vital information. While some of this may be somewhat
dated now the story still holds together as gripping.
While the only actor in this classic that will be readily familiar to the
American audience is McKern (the most popular Number Two in the Prisoner) don’t
let this put you off. The performances may verge on over the top but they are
excellent. Judd plays the paranoid reporter to the hilt. He has a code of
behavior, which mandates his actions. Stenning is a ladies man in his always
hitting on Jeannie yet gentleman enough to never take advantage of her. He is
the sixties rough and ready hero. Munro plays Jeannie more than the usual
hapless female of the day. This film was made at the very beginnings of the
feminist movement and it is reflected in her performance. Jeannie knows the risk
in telling the secret to the report yet she has to act in a way that is moral.
Munro shows great strength and control in the way she presents Jeannie. McKern
is wonderful as the acerbic editor. Caught between his loyalty to his position
at the paper and his friendship and admiration of Stenning the character is
presented in a far more complex manner than most SciFi flick. In all the cast
works together in a fantastic manner. The performances are ageless.
Val Guest directed this classic film. Best know for other British Sci-Fi like
the Quartermass Xperiment he was a master of the genre. Guest does not hit you
over the head with the dilemma contained in the plot; he builds slowly in an
organic way. At first the population takes the oppressive heat in stride, going
to the beach, public pools and amusement parks. Then, the state has to ration
the dwindling water supply until finally water is coveted as more precious than
gold. Guest knows how to tell a story so that the audience is drawn in. So many
contemporary films are so overt, not trusting the viewers to understand the
plot. Guest appreciates his audience and the fact that they can comprehend. This
respect for his audience comes across with a building tension rather than the
all too familiar ‘this is where…’ going through the audience’s mind. Hitchcock
had a similar style, it is more rewarding to build than reveal. While many will
feel the special effects lack the quality of today’s CGI effects, remember, it
was movies like this that paved the way for the Jurassic Parks and Star Wars. It
is films like this that the special effects masters watched as kids, in
amazement, striving to improve the craft.
The DVD is well done. Considering the film is forty years old, the video is
amazingly crisp and clear. This was obviously made by a transfer from a pristine
vaulted print. The transfer is 2.35:1 anamorphic and holds up against anything
out there. The version presented here contains the intercut stock footage not
seen since the film was released. While in black and white the opening and
ending are filmed through an orange gel to help the audiences feel the
oppressive heat. The sound track did not hold up as well. It is a bit murky at
some points. It was remastered to a Dolby two channel mono which may come over
better it you bypass the digital DVD output and filter it through your Prologic
circuits in Theater mode. While the features are minimal, a few TV and radio
spots, the real gem is the commentary by Val Guest. This commentary was recently
made and permits the director a chance to look back at his work. The track comes
across like a kindly grand father chatting by a fireplace to his attentive
grandchildren. It is halting at times, sometimes a bit out of order but remember
this is a 90 year old man looking back four decades. Whether you are a fan of
Sci-Fi or general movie history this is a must have to complete your collection.
Posted 1/2/05