It seems that lately whenever I see that a movie designated as a horror flick
I shudder. Not from the prospect of the fearsome circumstances and abject terror
that awaits but because it means sitting through yet another two hours of
mindless bloodshed and torture. The genre has been degraded to its lowest
possible form typically devoid of any shred of story line or character
development. One effect this lamentable trend is the dilution of expectations of
loyal fans of horror films. Anything that does not look like a training film for
the Spanish Inquisition comes across as refreshing. A recent example of this is
‘The Woman’. Right off it has to be mentioned that this film is not without its
share of gore or the infliction of pain but the difference is there was an
honest attempt made to place these activities within the context of a scary
story. A valid case can be made that this flick should be included on the
torture porn list but there are some mitigating factors at work. It is
reminiscent of the old summer campfire tales that were inherently gruesome but
the fear that is generated is done so by weaving a mental image that is
frightening. There is an honest attempt made to temper the excesses in pain and
bloodshed with the inclusion of social commentary. Albeit, it is an intense and
frequently explicit road taken but the bottom line is McKee did strive to retain
a greater psychological component than is typical found in the traditional
torture flick.
A movie like ‘The Woman’ takes a story suitable for such a venue and realizes
it on the screen. The blood, pain and terror are punctuation marks in the
overall narrative of the story. The filmmaker, Lucky McKee, realizes that the
best way to craft a scary story is through the slow build up of a
psychologically terrifying set of circumstances. A gut with a chain saw hacking
a teenager apart will affect the audience on a visceral level that will fade
shortly after the credits roll and the lights come up. In this film a regular
sort of man comes across a feral woman who becomes an escalating threat to his
family. Ultimately this comes down to a very familiar trope that happens to be a
personal favorite, a reasonable man pushed beyond any rational behavior. It
takes a certain touch to pull off a technique like this and fortunately for us
Me. McKee has it. The film is stylistically well constructed with a cast that
has made a notable mark in the genre. The movie is far too intense for a family
popcorn flick but is a solid contender for a mature fright night at home with
friends.
Chris Cleek (Sean Bridgers) is a man devoted to his family. His suburban
legal practice is modest but reasonably successful. His family consists of his
wife, Belle (Angela Bettis), teenage son Brian ((Zach Rand) and daughters Peggy
(Lauren Ashley Carter) and Darlin’ (Shyla Molhusen). This family dynamic sets
the base line for what will be considered normal civilized behavior. The
foundation is necessary in order to set up the situation crucial to establishing
the main theme driving the movie. The equilibrium is disrupted when Dad happens
across a feral woman (Pollyanna McIntosh). Chris captures her and imprisons her
ostensibly to help socialize her but there are some hidden elements covertly
lurking in his motivation. There is a sadistic misogyny permeating Chris’
personality that is triggered by chain the barely human creature in his shed.
His control issue surface as he brings his family to see his prisoner. Nothing
like show the wife and kids the filthy dirty, half dressed woman you caught in
the woods and dragged home to make for family memories. He tries to justify his
actions with an excuse that was used on a global scale during the height of
colonial expansion in Europe; it is the obligation of good, civilized people to
teach savages how to behave. It did work out too well back then and on this
microcosm scale it is an abject failure. It turns out that the woman is the last
of a tribe of savage mountain folk completely isolated from humanity. She is
capable of tracking and killing animals, grabbing fish from a stream and, when
the opportunity avails itself, cannibalism. Part of what I found interesting is
how McKee juxtaposed the women in the film demonstrating the inherent
personality flaws of Chris. On the surface he seems like a good husband opening
doors for his wife and polite affect but he is a control freak and ultimately
demeaning to his wife and daughters. The appearance of the woman affords Chris
the unhampered chance to train a woman properly, in his image of how a woman
should behave. If the woman fails to act in a fashion approved of by Chris will
illicit quick often brutal consequences he refers to as ‘corrections’. The son
is caught between watch the brutality exhibited by his father and the natural
reaction a boy that age has towards a half naked woman.
Ultimately McKee demonstrates the true savage is Chris. The woman reacts
violently but it is like poking a bear with a sharp stick, you get what you
asked for. Both the woman and Chris are brutal by nature it is just Chris hides
his true inclinations behind a veneer of socialization. McKee has some notable
experience in the genre. He worked with Ms Bettis previously in an equally
bizarre horror movie ‘May’ and a strange episode of ‘Masters of Horror’. His
style is to coax terror out of mundane circumstances taking the familiar off to
extremes. He tends to let things simmer allowing the audience an opportunity to
acclimate to the circumstances before he turns everything upside down, this film
is a dark, raw consideration of the brutality that can exist under the skin of a
so called regular. Chins is a hypocrite on every conceivable level. As a lawyer
he is an officer of the court sworn to uphold the lae but he thinks nothing of
kidnapping, unlawful imprisonment and torture. While you’re at it you might as
well throw in emotional spousal and child abuse. The woman is the only character
here true to her nature.